DICKNS-L Archives

Charles Dickens Forum

DICKNS-L@LISTSERV.CONNECT.UCSB.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show HTML Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Patrick McCarthy <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Charles Dickens Forum <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 15 Jul 2015 16:11:50 -0700
Content-Type:
multipart/alternative
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1070 bytes) , text/html (1480 bytes)
Friends of the Dickens Forum,

     Robert Newsom stands back and reminds us of the power and control
Dickens exerted over everything that appeared in the pages of his
journals, *Household Words* and *All the Year Round*: (pjm)
>
>
> The discovery of the annotated-by-Dickens set of AYR is of course
> tremendous and will vastly simplify the jobs of future scholars and editors
> interested in Victorian periodicals. But we should keep in mind that
> Dickens's hand touched every article that appeared in AYR and that the
> anonymity of its authors was for a purpose: to keep the whole of the
> journal under Dickens's conducting. Anonymity also freed its contributors
> from being held responsible for their unsigned work. If I write an unsigned
> article, I'm going to give my employer what he wants and he in any case is
> going to edit and even re-write as he sees fit.
>
> Everything in AYR was in effect endorsed by Dickens and nothing others
> contributed, if unsigned, was endorsed by them. So I do not feel the
> critical ground shaking underneath me. (And I live in California.)
>
>